AustLit logo

AustLit

Margaret Haining Margaret Haining i(15326655 works by) (a.k.a. Maggie Haining)
Gender: Female
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Works By

Preview all
1 Woman as Subject : Critical Perspectives of Australian Commercially Successful Plays with Leading Roles for Female Actresses Margaret Haining , 2019 single work criticism
— Appears in: Australasian Drama Studies , October no. 75 2019; (p. 13-45)

'[...]an overview of our programming study findings looks closely at a selection of the highest selling spoken-word plays with female protagonists between 2006 and 2017. Historically, mainstream theatre has served a largely white, middle-class audience.4 Contemporary mainstream Australian society is both socially and culturally diverse, and this has been at odds with mainstream theatre, which 'continues to construct and represent ... a masculinist, colonial and white hegemony'.5 Furthermore, research into contemporary audiences indicates that mainstream theatre has a noticeably larger female fan base6 and yet the repertoire of Australian mainstream theatre points to a disparity in the representation of female-centred stories.7 The under-representation of women's stories in mainstream Australian plays can be considered critically important to the field of contemporary Australian performance when we consider the gendered voices, and audiences, who are shut out of an important cultural and socio-political conversation by the noticeable absence of women's stories in mainstream repertoire. Historically, the female characters of Australian theatre tended to serve as a reflection of men's perspectives of women, failing to challenge the clearly Anglophile ethos of traditional gender roles.10 In Female Absence: Women, Theatre, and Other Metaphors, Rob Baum argues that gendered constructions of women in domestic roles, particularly as mothers, stems from the flawed design of women as written by men in 'the standard [theatrical] canon'.11 In mainstream plays, Baum calls out the common construction of the female character as 'the metaphorical opposite [to men], circumscribed by [her] relationship to both male roles/ identity and social possibility'.12 It was not until the impact of second-wave feminism on Australian theatre that the problems associated with women's lack of representation, and their misrepresentation, began to be addressed more widely in the industry.13 In an overview of female characters in mainstream repertoire, it is not uncommon to find characters in plays who seemingly exist to be what Kerrie Schaefer and Laura Ginters describe as 'empty vessels for the projected desires of the male characters'.14 While there are exceptions to the stereotypes, it should be noted that the majority of these exceptions in mainstream repertoire are written by women playwrights.15 There have been several texts that give accounts of female representation in Australian plays, which provide a context for understanding the perseverance of stereotypical female characters and largely absent female protagonists. In this text, Gilbert discusses how Australian theatre has perpetuated the dominant culture as masculine, and the 'Other' as feminine, stating that 'patriarchal hegemony proceeds ... through the privileging of the masculine pole of a series of binary oppositions constructed on gender difference'.17 Gilbert writes that the idea of an 'Australian voice' has always been associated with a white, male, Eurocentric voice at the expense of other voices, and had been relatively unchallenged by drama critics until scholarship informed by second-wave feminism appeared in the 1970s.'  (Publication abstract)

1 Hedda Margaret Haining , 2018 single work review
— Appears in: Australian Book Review , December no. 407 2018; (p. 69-70)

'One of the quandaries facing contemporary adaptations of classics is the risk of the story being lost in a translation, which can isolate the work from the original culture and text. Melissa Bubnic’s reimagining of Henrik Ibsen’s Hedda Gabler (which had its première in Munich in 1891) runs no such risk. Directed by Paige Rattray, Hedda removes Ibsen’s characters from nineteenth-century Norway and the world of academia and situates them in present-day Gold Coast on the deck of a ‘McMansion’. Although Hedda retains the original characters’ names, the setting is about as far away from Ibsen as you can imagine.'  (Introduction)

X