AustLit logo

AustLit

y separately published work icon JASAL periodical   peer reviewed assertion
Alternative title: Journal of the Association for the Study of Australian Literature
Date: 2008- Note: Co-editor with Susan Lever and Tanya Dalziell.
Date: 2008- Note: Co-editor with Susan Lever and Paul Genoni.
Date: 2002-2007
Date: 2002- Note: Co-editor.
Issue Details: First known date: 2002... 2002 JASAL
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

JASAL publishes any scholarly material with an interest in Australian literature or which might be of interest to people working in this field. It encourages comparative studies with other literatures and forms of representation beyond the literary. It is particularly interested in work which challenges received critical paradigms and which contributes to public debates. (Verso of title page, first issue).

On the Web

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

First known date: 2002
VIEW PUBLICATION DETAILS FOR ALL VERSIONS ()

Works about this Work

ERA and the Ranking of Australian Humanities Journals Paul Genoni , Gaby Haddow , 2009 single work criticism
— Appears in: Australian Humanities Review , May no. 46 2009; 'In Australian Humanities Review 45 Guy Redden draws upon his experience with the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) in the UK to warn Australian researchers of various dangers posed by the implementation of similar methods of evaluation that may be introduced under the banner of Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA). Redden is concerned with the tendency of emerging forms of research evaluation to privilege a small number of 'high ranking' journals, and of the distorting effect this has on research communication as authors obsessively target these journals. This in turn results in research funding being concentrated on a small number of institutions and research units that are (predictably) assessed as high-achievers.'
JASAL Online Paul Genoni , 2008 single work correspondence
— Appears in: Australian Book Review , May no. 301 2008; (p. 5)
JASAL Online Paul Genoni , 2008 single work correspondence
— Appears in: Australian Book Review , May no. 301 2008; (p. 5)
ERA and the Ranking of Australian Humanities Journals Paul Genoni , Gaby Haddow , 2009 single work criticism
— Appears in: Australian Humanities Review , May no. 46 2009; 'In Australian Humanities Review 45 Guy Redden draws upon his experience with the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) in the UK to warn Australian researchers of various dangers posed by the implementation of similar methods of evaluation that may be introduced under the banner of Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA). Redden is concerned with the tendency of emerging forms of research evaluation to privilege a small number of 'high ranking' journals, and of the distorting effect this has on research communication as authors obsessively target these journals. This in turn results in research funding being concentrated on a small number of institutions and research units that are (predictably) assessed as high-achievers.'
VIEW ALL WORKS ABOUT (2)

PeriodicalNewspaper Details

ISSN: 1447-8986
Frequency:
Irregular.
Range:
1 (2002) -
Last amended 10 Mar 2016 08:26:15
Newspapers:
    Powered by Trove
    X