AustLit
Latest Issues
AbstractHistoryArchive Description
'The literature of World War II has emerged as an accomplished, moving, and challenging body of work, produced by writers as different as Norman Mailer and Virginia Woolf, Primo Levi and Ernest Hemingway, Jean-Paul Sartre and W. H. Auden. This Companion provides a comprehensive overview of the international literatures of the war: both those works that recorded or reflected experiences of the war as it happened, and those that tried to make sense of it afterwards. It surveys the writing produced in the major combatant nations (Britain and the Commonwealth, the USA, Japan, Germany, France, Italy, and the USSR), and explores its common themes. With its chronology and guide to further reading, it will be an invaluable source of information and inspiration for students and scholars of modern literature and war studies.' (Publisher's blurb)
Contents
-
War Writing in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand,
single work
criticism
(p. 149-162)
'Even though the 1931 Statute of Westminster had made Australia, Canada,
and New Zealand independent nations with autonomous foreign policies,
New Zealand and Australia nevertheless responded to the outbreak of the
Second World War as if they were still colonies, automatically at war as they
had been in 1914. Both relied upon Britain for strategic imperatives such as
security and defence, as well as for economic reasons. Further, sentimental
links between Britain and its former colonies meant many continued to call
Britain "home" and to regard the British as their "kith and kin." Within
hours of Britain's declaration of war on Germany, both New Zealand's Prime
Minister, Michael Joseph Savage, and Australia's Prime Minister, Robert
Menzies, rushed to offer the British government their support because they
believed it inconceivable to do otherwise. In Canada, although the
Anglophile, imperialist, and monarchist Prime Minister, Mackenzie King,
was in favor of supporting Britain once war was declared, he knew he had
to satisfy Francophone Quebec's concerns about the conscription issue that
had proved so divisive in the FirstWorld War; thus he informed the nation he
would 'let Parliament decide.'' (p 149)
