AustLit logo

AustLit

Issue Details: First known date: 2017... 2017 Changing the Ending of Muriel’s Wedding Was a Betrayal of Its Feminist Spirit
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'In the all-singing, all-dancing stage musical update, this narrative and its implicit social commentary is almost unrecognisable. Gone is the bolshy ending; instead, a character who barely had four minutes of air time in the film – Brice, literally the first person Muriel kissed – returns to declare his love and drive both her and Rhonda to “happily ever after” on a bicycle trailer. While in the film, Muriel walked away from her faux-relationship with the hunky visa-chasing South African swimmer David after their first copulation; in the musical, her husband is a closeted Russian who realises the truth about his sexuality only after sleeping with Muriel. Crucially, where Muriel desperately sought marriage as proof of being “somebody”, she now not only desires marriage but, as importantly, Insta-fame. In conflating such disparate desires, Hogan not only identifies himself as belonging to the techno-panic generation, he also calls into question the very thing that endeared feminists to the film: its criticism of marriage as the pinnacle of female achievement.' (Introduction)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

Last amended 21 Dec 2017 06:30:23
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/dec/19/changing-the-ending-of-muriels-wedding-was-a-betrayal-of-its-feminist-spirit Changing the Ending of Muriel’s Wedding Was a Betrayal of Its Feminist Spiritsmall AustLit logo The Guardian Australia
X