AustLit logo

AustLit

Issue Details: First known date: 2020... 2020 Quaestio Vexata : Collecting Arundel “Chromos” in America and Australasia
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

AbstractHistoryArchive Description

'Frederick McCubbin (1855–1917), watching students copy chromolithographs and casts in Melbourne’s National Gallery School of Art, concluded it was “no end of a place to study”. The Arundel Society’s prints and other works of art acquired by the Public Library, Museum and Gallery reveal the alignment of education with the elevation of taste. The School’s use of the collection was not unusual at the time, and the tradition of copying in art education continued into the twentieth century. More worthy of remark, perhaps, are the students’ models: the Society published trecentro and quattrocento frescoes from northern and central Italy, as well as altarpieces by van Eyck, Memling and others.

'The prints, fictile ivories, photographs and texts produced by the Arundel Society (1848–1897) were disseminated from Britain around the world. The high-quality colour lithographs were available framed and glazed. They were used for reference, as objects of veneration or for interior decoration. The Society promoted its subscribers: members of the aristocracy, politicians, churchmen, scholars and artists; these included, for a time, the Pre-Raphaelites William Holman Hunt and William Morris. Writers such as William Rossetti, in the New York journal The Crayon in the 1850s, and James Smith in The Argus in Melbourne in the 1860s, devoted substantial space to the Society’s didactic aims and preservation activities.

'This richly-illustrated paper explores the vexed question of Arundel Society chromolithographs in museum collections, and their impact on the nascent discipline of art history. It examines intellectual networks in Australia and other British colonies, as well as American and European patterns of circulation, to consider knowledge of ‘the Primitives’ and expectations about art.' (Publication abstract)

Publication Details of Only Known VersionEarliest 2 Known Versions of

  • Appears in:
    y separately published work icon Australasian Journal of Victorian Studies vol. 24 no. 1 2020 21939631 2020 periodical issue

    'Welcome to this new issue of the Australasian Journal of Victorian Studies, my first one as Editor. We also have on board a new Reviews Editor, Alison Bedford.

    'We are very grateful for the work of our predecessors, Meg Tasker (Editor), and Jocelyn Hargrave (Reviews Editor). Meg is still on deck, since later this year, we will bring out the second Special Issue on Pre-Raphaelitism in Australia, which she is co-editing with Alison Inglis. Thanks also Carolyn Lake for her ongoing technical / formatting work.' (Introduction)

    2020
    pg. 28-50
Last amended 1 Jun 2021 09:10:49
28-50 Quaestio Vexata : Collecting Arundel “Chromos” in America and Australasiasmall AustLit logo Australasian Journal of Victorian Studies
X