AustLit logo

AustLit

Harpreet Pruthi Harpreet Pruthi i(A81627 works by)
Gender: Female
The material on this page is available to AustLit subscribers. If you are a subscriber or are from a subscribing organisation, please log in to gain full access. To explore options for subscribing to this unique teaching, research, and publishing resource for Australian culture and storytelling, please contact us or find out more.

Works By

Preview all
1 y separately published work icon Two Facets of Australian Verse Harpreet Pruthi , New Delhi : Rupa , 2004 Z1869717 2004 single work criticism

'Traces the genealogy of Australian poetry, from inception to present times. In the course of the study of Australian verse it focuses on the diametrically opposed thematic concerns of two poets.

The first of them, Kenneth Slessor, whose nihilism is all pervading, is treated as one of Australia's first modern poets. His work is a composite of antithetical elements that co-exist to reveal complex interfaces between the inner emergence of an artistic moment and the external experience of a verbal poetic artefact that disturbs and fascinates.

Les Murray contrastingly, writing in the comic vein, examines and interrogates issues associated with Australian society, the land and its inhabitants. He presents the reader with definite parameters of what falls within the umbrella of Australian-ness.

The study of Slessor and Murray's poetry has been perceived from an Indian's perspective, eliciting from a personal repertoire of cultural and philosophical heritage. Thereby, the book is peppered with spontaneous observations of the author which are inserted whenever Slessor and Murray evoke reflections of Indian thought.' (vii-viii)

1 Racist and Colonial Consciousness: Reading Judith Wright and Sally Morgan Harpreet Pruthi , 2004 single work criticism
— Appears in: Cultural Interfaces 2004; (p. 107-117)
Pruthi asserts that 'Australian women's writing [...] tends to tread on problematic grounds as it ends up confining itself to the very limits imposed and demarcated by the patriarchal-colonial-monolithic institution of literature as politics and politics as literature.'
X